<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AIDSpan, Global Fund Observer, and Social Market Analysts</title>
	<link>http://siliconvalleymusings.com/19/aidspan-global-fund-observer-and-social-market-analysts</link>
	<description>Steve's Thoughts, Observations, and Musings</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nic Fulton</title>
		<link>http://siliconvalleymusings.com/19/aidspan-global-fund-observer-and-social-market-analysts#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic Fulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://siliconvalleymusings.com/19/aidspan-global-fund-observer-and-social-market-analysts#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Steve,

I think the "Better Business Bureau" (http://www.bbb.org) attempts to do some of this for charities (http://www.give.org). This is clearly neither a sub- or super- set with NGOs, or foundations, but may be worth looking at. Someone I know in New York used to work for them and said that their mandate is mainly to stop charity scams, but they also look at percentage of funds put directly into action (i.e. rather than admin costs).

Cheers,

Nic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>I think the &#8220;Better Business Bureau&#8221; (http://www.bbb.org) attempts to do some of this for charities (http://www.give.org). This is clearly neither a sub- or super- set with NGOs, or foundations, but may be worth looking at. Someone I know in New York used to work for them and said that their mandate is mainly to stop charity scams, but they also look at percentage of funds put directly into action (i.e. rather than admin costs).</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Nic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
